Saturday, January 19, 2013

Our House


Long ago, there lived two brothers, in a two bedroom apartment. It was located nicely beside a riverfront. Bliss they both enjoyed at breakfast. The residence had state of the art equipment and lovely furniture. The family heirlooms were a pride and like fine wines matured with age.

In contrast, the living quarters failed to meet the expectation and sadly though wore an image of grim and destitute. The garbage’s were unkempt, endemic dust, untidy floor and equally frustrated individuals occupying it. They have made it a habit to coax and curse each other for the unfortunate condition of their quality of living.

Both were always complaining on how they will take care of this abomination of a house. The relations between them were not good either. They were trying to device a strategy to initiate a discussion to first take care of their own complexity and there after the house they reside in. Their own coterie of friends also provided requisite fuel to the already raging fire. They were after all, jealous of those family heirlooms and the rich traditions, they so vehemently covets for.

Days went passed, each and every discussion ended up in epic fights. The garbage as usual kept on increasing and the entire negativity then started to affect the human inside those unfortunate souls. They were even considering throwing the other out of the flat for good. They were up for blood.

One fine morning, it all started with a fight for ownership. The unclean dinner plates from last night made for an equally bad breakfast experience. The two brothers, now armed with solidified misconstrued conviction towards the malice intent of the other, jumps for the throat. There went the sanity down the road and the story ends with a bloodbath of epic proportion. They died in vein attempt of resolving the differences. Still, the house remained unkempt as it was but by now bears the filth of blood too.

What they could have done?

Each could have engaged in their own initiative to make things in order. For starter, arranging a house cleaning help would have been a great idea. Making it a habit to clear the garbage every night and taking care of their living quarters. That could have given rise to a peaceful coexistence, isn't it? They would not have gotten the time to indulge in those malicious activities in the first place whilst they share ownership and contribute out of his prerogative to make it livable. After all, it is the only thing left in this world for them and they both knew it.

Crudely though, does the story bore any resemblance to any other you are aware? If you notice, just by replacing the characters and with a little bit of imagination, one can comfortably narrate the story of Mahabharata. Reeling back to present context, the location of our country or the house we reside in hasn't changed but only we the citizens. The ideological difference then now has taken shape of religions. Good or bad only time will tell, but acceptance of the truth is the first step towards betterment. Akin to those two brothers we as a countrymen can sit idle, wish for communal harmony and devise various strategies, when at the very least we could start shouldering our own responsibility towards a greater good.

Communal harmony is the byproduct of a developed society. A society which is developed in thoughts, health and wealth gives rise to peaceful coexistence as a reward. The holy grail of harmony is only achievable when million voices and deed resonate together in nation building. No other country has done it before. They always needed the glue of religion or language to bind their national fabric. The American president had to shed his "Hussein" middle name for the election. Look at Pakistan for gods’ sake. See for yourself at Europe. The French, the English and zee Germans have their own country. Language and religion has always been a big barrier in those modern societies. While they were busy fighting the crusade, we the people of the Indo-Gangetic were a thriving population generating one third of the world’s income.

Are they developed? No, not at all. They have so far developed only in wealth and superficial health. Some not even that and clearly lacking in thoughts and intellect.

Are we developed? No, not at all. We may have developed in thoughts and knowledge only but not in health and certainly not in wealth.

How are we developed in thoughts? We as an Indic society, in our thousands of year’s journey have perfected the art of living in peace, harmony and progress. A more recent study suggests that we as a nation chug along well, who ever is at the helm. It’s a point of another discussion where the efficiency of the leader reflects the one that we have. All this while, after many crests and turfs, we as a society have matured enough to handle our own problems with the bests of the means available at hands.

The catch here, best of means is a deadly tool. When available to masses whose genes have so far survived tens of thousands of years in the Indo-Gangetic belt gives rise to an enormous opportunity of exploitation. The results are for you to see and you are by far the best critic of your own judgment. So the onus is now on you. The decision you make will shape your future. 

Bharat or India, if you will, as we see today, is only here because we the countrymen with nationalism as our religion have survived so far. Unfortunately, we do not even realize that we have this gem of a quality. The world lacks it; it’s an eyesore for them. The reason why they are so hell bent on teaching us the one thing which we already know so well because they do not want us to focus in our other area of development. They are jealous of us. Yet in our profound ignorance we fail to acknowledge it. Sadly enough we are still falling prey to those so called friends and intellectuals.

Take pride in your nation, take pride in your own countrymen and take deep pride in your roots. Shed the inhibition and start your march towards greater good. Only then we will again be the golden bird of the world we used to be. We are already there in our thoughts but we certainly need a conducive environment to express those in depth. A healthy and wealthy society, where our everyday materialistic problems are taken care of, is the only possible means of that.

No other kingdom, empire, nation or states have so far been able to achieve it. Fortunately though, we have already done it in the past. That brings me to the question, why not again in future? That I believe is possible only when we get our priorities right and start gathering pieces together. We as a problematic and chaotic nation with our unique problems have taken phenomenal stride towards our goal already. Post colonial times, the Macaulay-ite English propaganda history and education aside, the country as we know today, have progressed quite well in spite of the popular belief otherwise. It has only been sixty five years. It will take some more time before we are there. It is just that, few more steps are left. Those are the toughest of all.

We are at a crossroad and it is us who need to define our own path and destiny with clearly defined goals. Only then we can reach the pinnacle of the developed world we used to be.


2 comments:

  1. I agree with you on most counts, except perhaps on “We as an Indic society, in our thousands of year’s journey have perfected the art of living in harmony and progress.” Have we? Forgive me for not having a very high idea of India as a nation politically; I think it is no more than 65 years old, and as artificial as can be. As an age of a nation, 65 years is nothing.The Indian map is recent. We have been citizens of Kashi, Koshal, Anga, Magadh etc in ancient times; of Hyderabad, Bombay, Madras, Calcutta etc. more recently. Even today, we have so many separatist movements across the country….our idea and claim as a nation is very much questionable. Who is an Indian? What does the idea of India stand for? I visit a cosmopolitan city and start identifying khottas, tetuls, paiyaas, chinkis, mullahs, tribals, scheduled castes, anglos, marus, gujjus, gurkhas…am I an Indian? Is it my economic constraints limiting my expansion of the nationalist consciousness? I don’t think so.
    The non-tolerance and oppression of one religion by another, by one caste over another, one state over another, one race over another, one class over another, one language over another has been perpetually going on since pre-historic times in this land. To say we have perfected peaceful co-existence is a gross misrepresentation of reality. The oppressed tolerated the oppressors by force, not by choice.
    However, you’re spot-on when it comes to the cure. Economic well-being definitely acts as a great catalyst when it comes to comprehending and assimilating the high ideals of harmony, equality and responsible freedom. In my opinion however, the mechanism is slightly different. Though it is not the seed of those ideas, economic well-being sufficiently motivates the inherent selfish nature of human beings to achieve the same.
    For example, if you do not have resources, you fight for existence. If you find a common enemy, you are blessed. That will save the soul of the nation. If not, you’ll die due to infighting. Like many sub-Saharan nations dying now. Like the man who stoops to cannibalism in times of extreme hunger.
    If you have resources, you fight for opulence, dominance and exclusivity. You fight, unless one of the following happens:
    a) If you fight, that disturbs the system generating wealth for you, and you realize you need the system to survive. That is, you realize diversity as an essential to your economic well-being.
    b) You consider everyone as you and yours. Not as a duty or as mandated by law or taught in moral science books. You feel everyone as a part of you. Really.
    I think if the state (a) continues for sufficiently long time, the idea of (b) may originate. But still, (b) is largely utopian, and possibly occurs only when you as a geographically bound mixed population are currently facing or have just come out of a great crisis.
    So yes, I think these problems of India will abate to a large extent with economic prosperity. On a related note, if we agree real GDP per capita as a suitable index of level of development, you’ll agree that we either have to increase output or decrease population. In my opinion, the latter is the only sustainable answer to our problems. In the past, at present and in foreseeable future, population has been the root cause of most of the problems, and hardest impediment for the solutions. It is ironic that the one politician (Sanjay Gandhi) who dared and cared to act in this regard had to eliminated due to his “eccentricity”. I won’t go as far as to say, “may his tribe increase”, but you’ll agree that the mess that is India will perhaps require dictatorial efficiency to clean up if the dynastic rule continues. There – I think I’ve gone too far already. Must stop now. Thanks for the insightful post.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do not necessarily disagree with the notion that India is 65 years old. It is but half the story. The period of slavery has continued for around 1200 years. With 100 years of Macaulay education being the worst period of it all. If we reel back to the pre-Mughal period what do we have?

    Well, from bird's eye view of history, the concept of Bharat is "Ganarajya". It is the system of a federal state-centre structure. Take for example the Raj-suya yagna or Maurya Empire. It is thus the federal structure that has always brought us prosperity and golden ages.

    I believe in the concept of a pearl-necklace. A strong central leadership with a gamut of empowered states is what we call Bharat! Each of those gems will have common and unique traits to it. It is the process of gaining power at the state level while implementing administrative success and in turn the power/process/revenue reaching up to the national level.

    Take present Bharat, imagine the gene pool and put the above concept in perspective and what do we have? Another hint, take a look at Gujrat as a state.

    How to develop the Eastern Bharat?

    a. Build/Develop Kolkata/West Bengal as the financial hub of East with access to East and South East Asia via Kolkata Port.
    b. Build/Develop Orissa as manufacturing hub.
    c. Build/Develop Bihar and Jharkhand as natural resource provider.

    To achieve the above feat you have to have decentralized power. The states must have a say in their own revenue sharing with center. Center can only work as provider and not enforcer.
    How would this then impact the common psyche or the notion that we are Indian or Bharatiya?

    Let us imagine the concept of a father and child here. It may be a bit crude but bear with me. A child would only have respect for the father and take pride in its root if the father acts as a mentor while the child makes phenomenon stride towards his own development out of his own prerogative.

    We would first take pride in Akhandya Bharat and respect our neighbours all the same and in turn value each and every human life or Bhratiya-life to be precise. The era of the plenty would be reality and we would not fight.

    Going back to separatist and Evan-Jihadi movements, imagine the period before Chandragupta maurya. It bears an eerie resemblance. Some say Modi is the chanakya and chadragupta. I may or may not agree but certainly hope them reborn or better still, if we ourselves can elevate our own soul to their level.

    All humans are created equals but their transformation whether for good or bad starts from the very moment they are conceived. There lies the critical missing link.

    ReplyDelete